Selasa, 17 November 2009

Perbedaan Research dan Evaluasi

There are differences in points of view among behaviorial scientists, an "ideal" Research study is one in which:
  1. Problem selection and definition is the responsibility of the individual doing the research
  2. Tentative answers (hypotheses) to the problem may be derived by deduction from theories or by induction from an organized body of knowladge.
  3. Value judgments by the researcher are limited to those implicit in the selection of the problem
  4. Given the statement of the problem and the hypothesis, the research can be replicated
  5. The data to be collected are determined largely by the problem and the hypothesis
  6. Relevant variable can be controlled or manipulated, and systematic effects of other variables can be eliminated by randomization
 The Evaluation study may be described in terms of characteristics almost the reverse of those outlined above:
  1. The problem is almost completely determined by the situation in which the study is conducted. Many people may be involved in its definition and , because of its comlexity, the problem initially is difficult to define.
  2. Precise hypotheses usually cannot be generated ; rather the task becomes one of testing generalizations from a variety of research studies, some of which are basically contradictory. There are many gaps which in the absence of verified knowledge must be filled by reliance on judgment and experience
  3. Value judgments are made explicit in the selection and the definition of problem as well as in the development and implementation  of the procedures of the study.
  4. The study is unique to a situation and seldom can be replicated, even approximately
  5. The data to be collected are heavily influenced if not determined by feasibility. choices, when possible, reflect value judgments of decision-makers or of those who set policy. There are often large differences between data for which the collection is feasible and data which are of most value to the decision-makers.
  6. Only superficial control of a multitude of variables important to interpretation of results is possible. Randomization to eliminate the systematic effects of these variables is extremely difficult or impractical to accomplish.
Sumeber: Education evaluation: New roles new means, NSSE (the National Society for the Study of Education), United States of America, 1969
Makalah dari : John K. Hemphill 
Halaman. 190 s.d. 191

Rabu, 15 Juli 2009

Soal dan jawaban Reliabilitas Spearman-Brown

Butir soal sebanyak 60 butir memiliki koefisien reliabilitas Spearman Brown sebesar 0,9. Jika butir soal dianggap terlalu panjang maka butir soal diperpendek sehingga menjadi 40. Berapakah koefisien reliabilitasnya?
Jawab
Psb=2Ppp:(1+Ppp)
0,9=2Ppp:(1+Ppp)
0,45=Ppp:(1+Ppp)
0,45+0,45Ppp=Ppp
0,45=0,55Ppp
Ppp=0,45/0,55
Ppp=0,82

L=40/60=2/3=0,67

Psb=(L.Ppp)/(1+(L-1)Ppp)
Psb=(0,67.0,82)/(1+(0,67-1)0,82)
Psb=0,55/0,73
Psb=0,75